Educação escolar de adolescentes que cumpriram medida socioeducativa em privação de liberdade: caminhos e descaminhos (2016- 2019)

Abstract

Based on data analysis, this historical study proposes to identify whether adolescents and young people who have served a socio-educational internment measure in a socio-educational unit in Montes Claros-MG have reoffended. The aim was to question whether adolescents who studied at the state school that operates within the socio-educational unit continued their studies at a regular educational institution after their detention was lifted, or whether they reoffended or were enrolled in a prison educational institution. To this end, a historical, qualitative and quantitative study was carried out, through a documentary survey and data from the Minas Gerais School Administration System (SIMADE) (school transfer verification) and consultation of sources from the State School of Elementary and Secondary Education (2016 to 2019), duly substantiated by bibliographical research. After analyzing the data, semi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescents and young people who were repeat offenders and non-repeat offenders. From the data collected from SIMADE, it can be seen that between 2016 and 2019, 431 adolescents were enrolled in the school that operates within the Montes Claros Socio-Educational Unit, with an average age of 16.56 at the time of admission. It can also be seen that 150 adolescents were in the 6th grade of elementary school (34.80%), with a dysfunction between age and grade at the time of admission. When was looked at the last grade the adolescent attended during the socio-educational measure or after the socio-educational measure, was found that 26.45% were in the 8th grade of elementary school, which shows that the socio-educational unit is complying with the precepts of the ECA, regularizing its education, offering regular education and, in addition, Youth and Adult Education. Another point to note is that of the 431 adolescents, only 38 reoffended. Of these, three were in the socio-educational system and one was in prison, which means a reoffending rate of 8.81%. From the adolescents' speeches, it can be seen that the schools in the regular education system are not complying with Resolution no. 03 of May 13, 2016, especially in its Chapter VIII, Article 24, by refusing to enroll those who have left the socio-educational system, which demonstrates the stigma that adolescents in conflict with the law carry with them. Other points noted from the adolescents' speeches were the issue of abandonment by the family, the under-training of the workshops and school of the Socio-Educational Unit so that they adapt to the capitalist mode of production. Finally, the Undersecretary for Socio educational Measures (SUASE) needs to work with the State Education Department (SEE MG) to ensure that those who have left the system are taken into regular schools after they have left the socio-educational measure of juvenile detention.